Qing Revival Green-Ground Gilt Porcelain Hu-Form Vase清代復古風綠地描金瓷壺式尊
LANGUAGE UNLOCK
Glossary Roundup
Original Presentation Script
No narration for this appraisal report
Used for this report's TTS and avatar presentation.
Item Report
Qing Revival Green-Ground Gilt Porcelain Hu-Form Vase
清代復古風綠地描金瓷壺式尊
By:Jingdezhen kilns (attributed), unknown maker
Style:Qing dynasty archaistic; green-ground gilt enamel (bronze-imitation) porcelain
Origin:China
Materials:Porcelain body with green enamel and gilt decoration (overglaze); turquoise enamel to interior rim
Age:circa 1880–1930 (Late Qing to Republic period; Qianlong revival taste)
Condition:Very good (no visible chips or cracks; gilding appears bright; not examined under UV)
Value:$600–$1,500 at auction (as a late Qing/Republic example; far higher only if proven Qianlong period)
Maker's Marks / Writing:None visible in the provided image (base not shown)
Date:2025-08-07 23:25:49.551816
Description:
Archaistic baluster (hu-form) porcelain vase with a pair of stylized dragon loop handles. Apple-green enamel ground with raised gilt outlines forming leiwen (thunder) meanders, ruyi and lotus lappets, bead bosses, and small chilong devices; interior with pale turquoise enamel at the mouth. The decoration consciously imitates ancient gilt-bronze ritual vessels favored in the Qianlong court taste.
一件仿古壺式（胡式）瓷尊，兩側具夔龍形耳。通體施蘋果綠地，金彩高浮雕式描繪雷紋、如意及蓮瓣、圓狀鋲釘與小螭龍紋；口沿內見淡青綠釉。整器以瓷仿銅，承乾隆宮廷崇尚的古銅器趣味。
Curator Questions
Curated by Jade
Assessment:
Well-made archaistic porcelain hu with crisp, symmetrical modeling and bright gilt over a green ground, typical of late Qing–Republic production emulating Qianlong-period bronzes. No reign mark is visible in the provided image; the fresh gilding and overall uniformity suggest a later 19th–early 20th century date rather than 18th century. If a six-character Qianlong mark and convincing 18th-century features were present, value and importance would increase dramatically. A word about fakes.. this category is heavily reproduced; many modern examples mimic Qianlong court taste with bright green grounds and raised gilt lines, so proceed cautiously and verify the base, paste, and enamels under magnification and UV.
此件為工整的仿古瓷壺式尊，綠地描金鮮明，線條規整，符合清末至民國仿乾隆銅器風格的特徵。所提供照片未見年款；金彩鮮新、整體均勻度高，更傾向於19世紀末至20世紀初的製作，而非18世紀。若有乾隆六字款且具18世紀工藝特徵，價值與學術地位將大幅提升。A word about fakes.. 此門類仿品甚多，常以鮮綠地與浮起描金仿乾隆宮廷風，務必審視器底、胎釉特徵並以放大鏡與紫外光檢測以求證。
Individual Images:
whole item
Provenance:
Not provided
Condition:
Very good (no visible chips or cracks; gilding appears bright; not examined under UV)
Identification Score: 88%
Form, handle type, leiwen layout, and green ground with raised gilt strongly identify this as an archaistic hu-form Chinese porcelain vase made to imitate gilt-bronze. The motif and palette match late Qing/Republic Jingdezhen output.
其造型（壺式）、耳形（夔龍耳）、雷紋佈局及綠地描金均清楚指向仿銅的中國瓷器胡式尊。紋樣與色釉組合與清末至民國景德鎮製品相符，因此識別信心較高。
Authenticity Score: 30%
While period Qianlong examples exist, the pristine gilding, very even relief lines, and lack of base/mark evidence in the photo suggest a later revival piece. Without base, footrim, and enamel/paste close-ups, I must assume reproduction/late manufacture by default. A word about fakes.. Qing-style archaistic vases are widely copied in the late 20th–21st century; only scientific and connoisseurial checks (footrim wear, kiln grit, bubbles in enamel, UV) can raise confidence.
雖有乾隆時期真品作參考，但本品金彩過於鮮新、線條極為勻整，且照片未提供器底與年款資訊，更像清末至民國的復古製作。缺乏足部、胎質與釉面細節圖，原則上需保守視為後期製品。A word about fakes.. 此類清式仿古尊在20世紀後期至今仿造極多；需檢查足緣磨耗、窯砂、釉中氣泡與紫外光反應等以提高可信度。
Image Memory Note
Chinese porcelain archaistic hu-form vase with apple-green ground and raised gilt leiwen; likely late Qing/Republic; check base/mark to refine dating.
中國瓷仿古胡式尊，蘋果綠地描金雷紋；推定清末至民國；需看器底與款識以進一步定年。
Share: