Materials:Porcelain with underglaze blue and overglaze enamels (doucai/wucai)
Age:Circa 1980–2010
Condition:Excellent (no visible chips or cracks; glossy modern glaze; not officially graded)
Value:$80–$200 (auction, as a modern reproduction)
Maker's Marks / Writing:Underglaze blue six-character reign mark within double circle: 大清雍正年制 (Da Qing Yongzheng Nian Zhi) — likely apocryphal.
Date:2025-10-14 04:06:08.686602
Description:
Baluster-form porcelain vase with flared mouth and splayed foot, decorated in a doucai manner: underglaze cobalt outlining with overglaze enamels in iron-red, green, yellow, and turquoise. The body shows pomegranate and flowering branches; the neck carries a jeweled lappet band and ruyi-head border. The base bears a six-character Yongzheng reign mark in underglaze blue within double circles.
瓷质胆式瓶，口外撇、圈足外撇。以斗彩工艺装饰：釉下青花勾勒，配以红、绿、黄、松石绿等釉上彩。腹部绘石榴与花枝，颈部饰宝相花莲瓣与如意纹边饰。底部青花双圈内书六字“雍正年制”楷书款。
Curator Questions
Curated by Jade
Assessment:
This vase faithfully imitates Yongzheng-period doucai aesthetics, but multiple indicators point to a modern reproduction: the enamels are bright and even with pooled, glossy surfaces; the banding on the neck appears formulaic and mechanically neat; the foot shows clean machining with little kiln grit; and the Yongzheng six-character mark is standard and even, typical of later apocryphal marks. A word about fakes.. Qing imperial-marked porcelains are among the most frequently forged categories; caution is essential when a perfect condition piece bears a rare reign mark. Overall, attractive as decorative porcelain but unlikely to be of the period. {chavatar_catchphrase}
本件器形与纹饰仿清雍正斗彩风格，但多处细节显示为当代仿制品：彩釉色泽鲜亮、光泽均匀并有积釉；颈部莲瓣及边饰图案工整机械；圈足修坯干净，少见窑渣砾痕；底款“雍正年制”书写端正统一，具后世常见的赝款特征。A word about fakes.. 清代官窑款识瓷器为赝作高发领域，完美无瑕且带名贵年款者尤需谨慎。总体而言，此瓶装饰性强，但不太可能为雍正时期真品。{chavatar_catchphrase}
Individual Images:
Detail of the body shows pomegranate fruits with iron-red overglaze and blue underglaze outlines; enamels pool slightly around contours—typical of modern application. The neck close-up shows a highly regular lappet band with uniform dotting and parallel hatching
suggesting stencil/transfer guidance rather than freehand imperial painting. The base photo shows a neatly centered six-character Yongzheng mark in regular script within double rings; the mark is even and lacks the calligraphic vitality of 18th-century marks. The foot rim is clean
lightly stained at edges
and lacks kiln grit or firing flaws expected on early Qing pieces.
Provenance:
Not provided
Condition:
Excellent (no visible chips or cracks; glossy modern glaze; not officially graded)
Identification Score: 92%
Form, palette, and motifs clearly identify it as a Yongzheng-style doucai-decorated Chinese porcelain vase; details align closely with modern Jingdezhen revival work.
器形、用色与纹饰清晰表明其为中国瓷器中“雍正风格斗彩”之仿制类型；多处细节与近现代景德镇复古作品一致。
Authenticity Score: 25%
Spurious six-character Yongzheng mark (FAKER FLAG #6), pristine condition, bright modern enamels, and uniformly finished foot ring all suggest late 20th–21st century manufacture rather than 18th century imperial ware.
底部六字“雍正年制”款疑为赝款（伪作信号#6），器物近乎完美无使用痕，彩釉鲜亮且现代感强，圈足修坯规整，综合判断为20世纪末至21世纪的仿制品，非十八世纪官窑器。
Image Memory Note
None
None
Keywords
Chinese porcelain, Yongzheng style, doucai, wucai, pomegranate motif, Qing revival, apocryphal reign mark, Jingdezhen, modern reproduction, China
中国瓷器, 雍正风格, 斗彩, 五彩, 石榴纹, 清代复古, 伪年款, 景德镇, 现代仿品, 中国
The report was edited after initial Artmink draft. Original AI draft preserved in Artmink audit history.
Share: