Chinese Qing Revival Famille Rose Turquoise-Ground Porcelain Lobed Bowl中国清式粉彩松石绿地瓜棱口莲塘鸳鸯纹瓷碗
LANGUAGE UNLOCK
Glossary Roundup
Original Presentation Script
No narration for this appraisal report
Used for this report's TTS and avatar presentation.
Item Report
Chinese Qing Revival Famille Rose Turquoise-Ground Porcelain Lobed Bowl
中国清式粉彩松石绿地瓜棱口莲塘鸳鸯纹瓷碗
By:Unknown; apocryphal Qianlong mark (Da Qing Qianlong Nian Zhi)
Style:Qing Revival / Republic-era Famille Rose (fencai), Lotus-and-Ducks motif
Origin:China
Materials:Porcelain body; overglaze famille rose enamels; turquoise glaze; iron-red seal mark; hardwood stand
Age:circa 1920–1950 (Republic of China), possibly mid-20th century
Condition:Very good (light surface wear and kiln specks; no obvious chips or cracks in images; stand later)
Value:$200–$500 auction estimate (stand included)
Maker's Marks / Writing:Iron-red square seal, likely reading 大清乾隆年製 (Da Qing Qianlong Nian Zhi); small handwritten paper label 'Ch'ien Lung 1736–1795'.
Date:2025-10-16 12:24:27.973574
Description:
A large porcelain bowl with a lobed, foliate rim. The interior is entirely covered in a turquoise glaze; the exterior is enamelled in famille rose with lotus blooms, pads and mandarin ducks above a scalloped wave border. The base is turquoise-glazed with an iron-red square seal mark; displayed on a later hardwood stand.
一件口沿呈花口瓜棱形的大型瓷碗，内壁通体施松石绿釉，外壁以粉彩描绘荷塘、莲花与鸳鸯，并在近底部饰以海浪回纹。底部施松石绿釉，中央有红彩篆书方形印款；配后配硬木座。
Curator Questions
Curated by Jade
Assessment:
Well-made decorative bowl in the Qing revival taste. The bright turquoise ground, thick outline-and-wash enamels and the iron‑red square seal to a fully turquoise base are characteristic of late Qing to Republic production rather than 18th-century imperial ware. The painting is competent but not of imperial quality; the Qianlong mark is almost certainly apocryphal and added to honor an earlier style. A word about fakes.. Chinese famille rose with spurious imperial reign marks is a category rife with later reproductions; approach any Qianlong-marked turquoise-ground pieces with skepticism. Overall, this reads as a Republic-period or later revival work, decorative and collectible but not of the Qianlong period. {chavatar_catchphrase}
此碗为仿清代风格的装饰性佳作。松石绿地、以描边分水法绘制的粉彩、以及满施绿釉的底心配红彩篆书方款，均更符合清末至民国时期的工艺特征，而非十八世纪宫廷水平。绘工娴熟但未达御窑标准；“乾隆年制”印款应为尊古所加的借款。A word about fakes.. 粉彩器物上带有帝王年款者充斥着后作与赝品，尤其是松石绿地、乾隆款更需谨慎鉴别。综合判断，本品更可能为民国时期或稍后的复古之作，具装饰与收藏价值，但非乾隆时期真品。{chavatar_catchphrase}
Individual Images:
none
Provenance:
No documented provenance provided; only a small handwritten label on base.
Condition:
Very good (light surface wear and kiln specks; no obvious chips or cracks in images; stand later)
Identification Score: 88%
Form, palette, lotus-and-ducks motif, turquoise interior/exterior, and painted wave border are consistent with Chinese famille rose wares; base finish and mark point to a revival/Qing-export lineage.
器形、配色、荷塘鸳鸯纹样以及内外皆施松石绿釉并配浪纹边饰，均与中国粉彩器物特征吻合；底部做法与篆书款式提示为复古/外销体系。
Authenticity Score: 40%
The iron-red Qianlong seal is apocryphal; enamels are glossy and thick with dark outlines, and the clean turquoise base/foot lack the wear and kiln grit seen on 18th-century imperial bowls. Likely Republic-era or later rather than Qianlong period.
红彩“乾隆年制”印款为借款；釉彩光亮厚实、描边较重，底与足较洁净，缺少十八世纪御窑器常见的窑渣与自然磨耗，更接近民国或更晚的制作。
Image Memory Note
None
None
Keywords
Chinese, Qing Revival, Republic period, famille rose, turquoise ground, lotus and ducks, porcelain, lobed bowl, apocryphal Qianlong mark
中国, 清式复古, 民国时期, 粉彩, 松石绿地, 荷塘鸳鸯, 瓷器, 花口碗, 乾隆仿款
The report was edited after initial Artmink draft. Original AI draft preserved in Artmink audit history.
Share: