Chinese Qianlong Style Famille Rose Turquoise-Ground Porcelain Lotus Bowl中国乾隆风格 粉彩松石绿地莲荷纹海棠口瓷碗
LANGUAGE UNLOCK
Glossary Roundup
Original Presentation Script
No narration for this appraisal report
Used for this report's TTS and avatar presentation.
Item Report
Chinese Qianlong Style Famille Rose Turquoise-Ground Porcelain Lotus Bowl
中国乾隆风格 粉彩松石绿地莲荷纹海棠口瓷碗
By:Unknown (likely Jingdezhen kilns)
Style:Qing revival, famille rose on turquoise ground (Qianlong style)
Origin:China
Materials:Porcelain with turquoise glaze and overglaze famille rose enamels; iron-red stamped seal mark
Age:Circa 1900–1930 (Republic period or late Qing)
Condition:Very Good (minor glaze wear and pinholes; no obvious chips or cracks visible; not professionally assessed)
Value:$80–$250 at auction
Maker's Marks / Writing:Iron-red stamped apocryphal seal mark reading Da Qing Qianlong Nian Zhi; old handwritten paper label 'Ch'ien Lung 1736–1795.'
Date:2025-10-16 12:18:35.489274
Description:
A lobed, large porcelain bowl with scalloped (haitang) rim, fully glazed in turquoise inside and base, and decorated on the exterior in famille rose enamels with lotus blossoms, pads, and waterfowl on a watery turquoise ground; wave-lappet border above the foot. The recessed base bears an iron-red stamped apocryphal Qianlong seal mark.
一件海棠花口大瓷碗，内外施松石绿釉，碗外以粉彩绘制莲花、荷叶与水禽，地子作水纹效果，足上方饰海浪连弧纹。圈足内施松石绿釉，并印有一枚矾红“乾隆年制”仿款篆书印记。
Curator Questions
Curated by Jade
Assessment:
The bowl is a well-decorated Qianlong-style example rather than an imperial-period piece. The turquoise ground, lobed rim and lotus-pond motif are classic, but the iron-red stamped Qianlong mark, uniform turquoise base, and painting quality indicate a late Qing/Republic kiln product made in homage to the 18th century. A word about fakes.. Chinese famille rose wares are heavily reproduced; apocryphal Qianlong marks are extremely common, so caution is warranted. This appears to have some honest age and use, consistent with early 20th century manufacture, not 18th century imperial.
此碗应为仿乾隆风格作品，并非乾隆朝御瓷。其松石绿地、海棠花口与莲塘纹样典型，但圈足内均一的松石绿釉、矾红钤印式“乾隆年制”款以及绘画笔法，均显示其为清末至民国时期景德镇窑仿古之作。A word about fakes.. 粉彩瓷在市场上赝品极多，乾隆仿款尤为常见，需谨慎鉴别。本件具备一定自然旧痕，较符合二十世纪早期的年代特征，而非十八世纪御制。
Individual Images:
none
Provenance:
No documented provenance provided; only an old handwritten label on base.
Condition:
Very Good (minor glaze wear and pinholes; no obvious chips or cracks visible; not professionally assessed)
Identification Score: 85%
Form, palette, turquoise ground, lotus-pond decoration and apocryphal Qianlong seal mark clearly point to a Qianlong-style famille rose bowl; high confidence in type though exact kiln/date cannot be proven from photos alone.
器形、粉彩配色、松石绿地、莲塘题材与矾红乾隆仿款均表明其为“乾隆风格粉彩”碗；尽管无法仅凭照片精确到具体作坊与年份，但对品类判断把握度较高。
Authenticity Score: 35%
While the piece likely has early 20th-century age, the stamped apocryphal Qianlong mark, glossy even turquoise base, and painting quality suggest a revival/reproduction of Qianlong taste rather than an 18th-century imperial bowl. Without thermoluminescence or hands-on inspection, caution dictates a conservative score.
本件应有二十世纪早期年代，但矾红钤印式“乾隆年制”仿款、底心松石绿釉均匀光亮、绘画工致度一般，均显示其为仿乾隆趣味的后出品，而非十八世纪御窑器。未经过科学或实物检测，故谨慎给出较保守的真伪评分。
Share: